临床荟萃 ›› 2025, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 400-407.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-583X.2025.05.003

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

血常规衍生的新型炎症指标与急性前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者PCI术后院内发生不良心血管事件的相关性

刘萍1, 于猛1, 刘明新1, 李文锋2()   

  1. 1.锦州医科大学附属第一医院 心内科,辽宁 锦州 121000
    2.大连市金州区第一人民医院 心内科,辽宁 大连 116100
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-16 出版日期:2025-05-20 发布日期:2025-05-23
  • 通讯作者: 李文锋 E-mail:liwenfengqiuxue@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省重点研发计划指导计划项目——骨髓间充质干细胞源外泌体递送miR-let-7g改善动脉粥样硬化机制研究(2019JH8/10300037)

Correlation of new inflammatory indicators in the complete blood count with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

Liu Ping1, Yu Meng1, Liu Mingxin1, Li Wenfeng2()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121000, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, the First People's Hospital Jinzhou Dalian, Dalian 116100, China
  • Received:2024-12-16 Online:2025-05-20 Published:2025-05-23
  • Contact: Li Wenfeng E-mail:liwenfengqiuxue@163.com

摘要:

目的 探讨中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、衍生中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(dNLR)、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值(MLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)与急性前壁ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)术后院内发生主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系。方法 回顾性研究,收集2021年12月-2023年12月于锦州医科大学附属第一医院首次接受PCI治疗的急性前壁STEMI患者共322例。收集患者的临床资料并按照院内是否发生MACE将患者分为MACE组和非MACE组,此外,根据慢性病种类,分为高血压亚组及非高血压亚组,糖尿病亚组及非糖尿病亚组进行分析。分别使用logistic回归分析和受试者工作特征曲线探讨NLR、dNLR、MLR、PLR与研究对象发生MACE之间的关系。结果 在多因素logistic回归分析中,NLR(OR=2.232,95%CI:1.233~4.041,P=0.008)、dNLR(OR=2.128,95%CI:1.398~3.237,P=0.015)、MLR(OR=1.764,95%CI:1.118~2.785,P<0.001)是急性前壁STEMI患者PCI术后院内发生MACE事件的独立危险因素,而PLR与MACE的发生差异无统计学意义。在亚组分析中,高血压亚组中的NLR,非高血压亚组中的dNLR、MLR以及非糖尿病亚组中的NLR、dNLR、MLR是急性前壁STEMI患者PCI术后院内发生MACE事件的独立危险因素(P<0.05),而糖尿病亚组中4个指标差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。受试者工作特征曲线结果提示NLR(AUC=0.781,95%CI:0.720~0.843,P<0.001)、dNLR(AUC=0.687,95%CI:0.622~0.753,P<0.001)、MLR(AUC=0.711,95%CI:0.641~0.781,P<0.001)、PLR(AUC=0.708,95%CI:0.639~0.777,P<0.001)均对研究对象发生MACE事件有一定预测能力,且4个指标联合的预测能力(AUC=0.831,95%CI:0.751~0.863,P<0.001)优于单一指标(P<0.05)。结论 NLR、dNLR、MLR是急性前壁STEMI患者PCI术后院内发生MACE的独立危险因素;此外,NLR、dNLR、MLR、PLR均对院内发生MACE有一定的预测价值,且四者联合的预测能力更强。

关键词: 前壁心肌梗死, 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗, 新型炎症指标, 主要不良心血管事件

Abstract:

Objective This study aims to explore the correlation of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) acute anterior wall ST The relationship between in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute anterior wall ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods This was a retrospective study involving 322 patients diagnosed with acute anterior wall STEMI who underwent their first PCI at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University between December 2021 and December 2023. Clinical data were collected, and patients were categorized into MACE and non-MACE groups based on the occurrence of in-hospital MACEs. Furthermore, patients were stratified into subgroups according to the presence of chronic diseases, including hypertension (hypertension and non-hypertension subgroups) and diabetes (diabetes and non- diabetes subgroups). Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were employed to investigate the correlation of NLR, dNLR, MLR, and PLR with the incidence of MACEs among the study subjects. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NLR (OR=2.232, 95%CI: 1.233-4.041, P=0.008), dNLR (OR=2.128, 95%CI: 1.398-3.237, P=0.015), and the MLR (OR=1.764, 95%CI: 1.118-2.785, P<0.001) were independent risk factors for in-hospital MACEs following PCI in patients with acute anterior wall STEMI. In contrast, PLR did not demonstrate a significant correlation with MACEs. Subgroup analyses revealed that NLR in the hypertension subgroup, dNLR and MLR in the non-hypertension subgroup, and NLR, dNLR, and MLR in the non-diabetes subgroup were independent risk factors for in-hospital MACEs after PCI in patients with acute anterior STEMI (all P<0.05). However, none of the four indicators showed significant differences in the diabetes subgroup (all P>0.05). The ROC curve indicated that NLR (area under the curve [AUC]=0.781, 95%CI: 0.720-0.843, P<0.001), dNLR (AUC=0.687, 95%CI: 0.622-0.753, P<0.001), MLR (AUC=0.711, 95%CI: 0.641-0.781, P<0.001), and PLR (AUC=0.708, 95%CI: 0.639-0.777, P<0.001) all possessed predictive capabilities for the occurrence of MACEs among the study subjects. Furthermore, the combined predictive capability of these four indicators (AUC=0.831, 95%CI: 0.751-0.863, P<0.001) was superior to that of any individual indicator (all P<0.05). Conclusion NLR, dNLR, and MLR are independent risk factors for in-hospital MACEs following PCI in patients with acute anterior wall STEMI. Furthermore, NLR, dNLR, MLR, and PLR exhibit predictive value for in-hospital MACEs, with their combined predictive capability proving to be even more robust.

Key words: anterior wall myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, novel inflammatory markers, major adverse cardiovascular events

中图分类号: